Low-dose olanzapine, sedation and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Aims: Comparison of efficacy, safety and sedation between two doses of olanzapine in the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Patients & methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted, enrolling 68 patients receiving a single-day cycle of high and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients received either of olanzapine 5 mg or 10 mg from day 1 through 3 in addition to ondansetron and dexamethasone. Control of CINV, nausea, sedation, quality of life (QoL) and adverse events were compared. Results: Nausea, emesis control and improvement of QoL were similar in both groups. Sedation severity was 133% higher with 10 mg olanzapine. Conclusions: Lower dose olanzapine is effective to control CINV with significantly reduced sedation.

Lay abstract Methods to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are often not sufficient for patients. Olanzapine, along with other similar drugs (antiemetics), improved control but is often sedating. In this study, a lower dose of olanzapine was compared with the conventional dose. Patients on cancer chemotherapy, which has high occurrence of nausea and vomiting, were given either the low dose or the conventional dose of olanzapine for 3 days, in addition to some other antiemetic agents. Control of nausea and vomiting was reasonably achieved with both doses of olanzapine. The lower dose was significantly less sedating. There were no serious side effects with either doses.

A comparative study of different dose fractionations schedule of thoracic radiotherapy for pain palliation and health-related quality of life in metastatic NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the effect of different hypo fractionated thoracic radiotherapy schedules in relation to thoracic pain relief, overall survival and post radiotherapy HRQOL in metastatic NSCLC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stage IV NSCLC and had intra-thoracic symptoms, included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to three treatments arms. (i) 17 Gy in 2 fractions in one week (ii) 20 Gy in five fractions in one week. (iii) 30 Gy in 10 fractions in two weeks. BPI module was used to assess pain score before and after the thoracic radiotherapy. Functional assessment of cancer therapy-G (FACT-G) used to investigate changes in HRQOL. Clinicians' assessment of symptom improvement were recorded at 2(nd), 6(th) and 12(th) weeks after completion of TRT. RESULTS: Pain relief, HRQOL and OS were equivalent in all the three arms. The median OS were 6 months, 5 months, 6 months in arm A, B and arm C, respectively. CONCLUSION: Protracted palliative thoracic radiotherapy renders no added advantage of relief of symptoms, HRQOL and overall survival compared to short course palliative TRT in metastatic NSCLC.